• Skip to content

f3_law_logo

Client Alert

SB 866 Creates Significant Change on Union Dues

June 2018less than a minute

The United States Supreme Court is expected to issue its decision on the legality of mandatory agency/service fees for non-union members in public employment next week. This has prompted numerous questions regarding how public agency employers are to respond. In anticipation of the decision in Janus v. AFSCME, the California legislature has fast-tracked statutory revisions to current law through budget trailer bill SB 866, in an effort to address the decision’s impact on public employee unions. F3 Law recently partnered with the Association of California School Administrators (ACSA) and our legal alliance partner firms to address the questions we are receiving regarding how agencies can/should/must respond. You can access this FAQ HERE.

The FAQ is intended only as a general summary of some of the legal issues presented. If you have any specific questions on how to respond post-Janus, please contact one of our six offices.

Share this page

Professionals

  • Media item displaying: Elizabeth B. “Lisa” Mori

    Elizabeth B. “Lisa” Mori

    Partner

    Oakland
    510.550.8222 510.550.8222
    emori@f3law.com

View All SB 866 Creates Significant Change on Union Dues Professionals

Related Services

  • Employment Law
Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP
Get the latest F3 Insights and Invitations
Sign-up Now
Contact Us
  • © 2026 Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Site by
  • Professionals
  • Services
  • Insights & News
    • Announcements
    • Client Alert
    • News
    • Symposium Materials
    • Tips & Tools
    • Viewpoints
  • Events
    • Special Education Symposium
    • Student Services Legal Symposium
    • First Fridays Forum
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership
    • Locations
  • Careers
    • Our People
    • Job Opportunities
  • Our Culture
  • Civics
  • Contact Us