• Skip to content

f3_law_logo

Viewpoints

Subcontractor’s Bond Claim Revived Despite Timing Challenge

May 22, 2025less than a minute
Featured Image

In Tarlton & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Co. (2025), the California Court of Appeal reinstated a subcontractor’s claim on a public works payment bond, rejecting the trial court’s finding that it was filed too late.

The court held that the statute of limitations hinges on when all work under the bonded contract ceases—not just the subcontractor’s work. Because that date was unclear, the issue couldn’t be resolved on demurrer.

Key Takeaway: Timing for public bond claims depends on when all work on the bonded contract work stops—not just when a subcontractor finishes.

Share this page

Professionals

  • Media item displaying: Jim Traber

    Jim Traber

    Partner

    Sacramento
    916.604.3083 916.604.3083
    jtraber@f3law.com

View All Subcontractor’s Bond Claim Revived Despite Timing Challenge Professionals

Related Clients

  • Public Education K-12
Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP
Get the latest F3 Insights and Invitations
Sign-up Now
Contact Us
  • © 2026 Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Site by
  • Professionals
  • Services
  • Insights & News
    • Announcements
    • Client Alert
    • News
    • Symposium Materials
    • Tips & Tools
    • Viewpoints
  • Events
    • Special Education Symposium
    • Student Services Legal Symposium
    • First Fridays Forum
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership
    • Locations
  • Careers
    • Our People
    • Job Opportunities
  • Our Culture
  • Civics
  • Contact Us