• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP

Newsflash

Academic Benefit Least Restrictive Environment Factor Means Progress on IEP Goals

February 20233 minute read

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has changed the landscape of what constitutes the least restrictive environment (“LRE”) for students with individualized education programs (“IEPs”) by ruling that a student receives satisfactory academic benefit in a regular education classroom when the student makes progress on academic IEP goals even though a heavily-modified curriculum and the support of a one-to-one aide result in minimal academic participation with typical peers.     (D.R. v. Redondo Beach Unified Sch. Dist., 56 F.4th 636 (9th Cir. 2022.)

Existing law requires that students with disabilities are educated in the LRE, which means with their typical peers to the maximum extent appropriate.   In addition, students with disabilities shall be removed from the regular classroom only when the nature or severity of the disability prevents the student from being satisfactorily educated even with the use of supplementary aids and services.  (Id.)  In analyzing whether a regular classroom is the LRE, an IEP team must determine that the student is making enough academic progress that his education is being achieved satisfactorily even if another setting would be academically superior.  Other relevant factors in the LRE analysis are non-academic benefits (e.g., social and communication) the student receives from the regular classroom, potential negative effects the student’s presence may have on the other students in the classroom (e.g., whether the student has disruptive behaviors or needs an unreasonable amount of the teacher’s time to the detriment of other students), and the cost of educating the student in the regular classroom.

In the Redondo Beach case, the student was placed in a regular classroom with a one-to-one aide for 75% of the day and spent the remainder of the day in a special education classroom.  Using heavily-modified curriculum and with one-to-one aide support, the student met four of his six academic IEP goals and made progress on the other two.  Nevertheless, the District believed the student would receive more academic benefit if his time in the special education setting was increased and proposed a blended placement of 56% of the day in regular education with aide support, and 44% of the day in special education.  The parents contended that the student was being satisfactorily educated by spending most of his day in the regular education class and filed for due process.

The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) ruled that the District’s proposed placement did not violate the IDEA, so the parents appealed to federal District Court.  The District Court agreed with the ALJ that the student’s heavily-modified curriculum and need to spend most of his time working with his aide resulted in minimal academic participation.  The District Court observed that the student “was effectively on an island in general education for academic purposes,” so spending most of his day in regular education was not the LRE.  The District Court also agreed with the ALJ that the student’s success on his IEP goals did not result from inclusion in the regular education classroom, but from working on the heavily-modified curriculum with his aide and with the time spent in the special education setting.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, ruling that the District’s proposed blended placement was not the LRE because the student was being educated “satisfactorily” in the regular education classroom.  The Ninth Circuit explained that for students whose disabilities prevent them from performing at grade level, the proper measure of academic benefit under Rachel H. is whether the student makes progress toward academic IEP goals.  This the student did.  The District’s contention that the student could have made more academic progress in the special education setting did not outweigh the substantial non-academic benefits the student received in the regular classroom.

Key Take Aways

  1. The proper LRE measure of whether a student is receiving satisfactory academic benefit in a regular education class is the amount of progress the student makes on academic IEP goals.
  2. Complying with LRE may mean that a student works several years below grade level on heavily-modified curriculum with an aide in a regular classroom.
  3. A student who minimally participates in the academic portion of the regular class due to working on heavily-modified curriculum with an aide may be receiving academic benefit.
  4. Increased time in special education that would enable the student to attain more academic achievement is not a factor in the LRE analysis.

Recommendations for IEP Teams

  1. IEP teams should continue to make individualized decisions about a student’s placement based on the student’s needs and goals.
  2. Although IEP teams must continue to consider the four Rachel H. factors when making placement decisions, IEP teams now need to consider that even if a student has minimal academic participation in a regular education class due to heavily-modified curriculum and the support of a one-to-one aide, regular education nevertheless may be the LRE.

If you have any questions regarding how to apply the Redondo Beach decision to particular students, please call any one of our six offices.

Download PDF
Share this page

Professionals

  • Media item displaying: Tiffany M. Santos

    Tiffany M. Santos

    Partner

    San Diego
    760.304.6013760.304.6013
    tsantos@f3law.com
  • Media item displaying: Kathleen Anderson

    Kathleen Anderson

    Associate

    Fresno
    559.860.4707559.860.4707
    kmcdonald@f3law.com
  • Media item displaying: Elizabeth B. “Lisa” Mori

    Elizabeth B. “Lisa” Mori

    Partner

    Oakland
    510.550.8222510.550.8222
    emori@f3law.com
View All Academic Benefit Least Restrictive Environment Factor Means Progress on IEP Goals Professionals

Related Services

  • Special Education
  • Student Rights & Discipline
Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP
Get our latest newsflashes
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact Us
  • © 2023 Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Professionals
  • Services
    • Business
    • Communications & Media Relations
    • Education Technology
    • Employment Law
    • Facilities & Construction
    • Governance & Leadership
    • Government Affairs & Public Policy
    • Interscholastic Activities
    • Investigations
    • Labor Relations & Negotiations
    • Litigation
    • Next Level Client Services
    • Real Estate & Property
    • Special Education
    • Student Rights & Discipline
    • Title IX
    • Virtual Learning
  • Our Clients
    • Charter Schools
    • Community Colleges
    • Higher Education
    • Independent & Private Schools
    • Public Agencies
    • Public Education K-12
    • Religious & Parochial Schools
  • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Access
  • Events
    • Special Education Symposium
    • Student Legal Symposium
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership
    • Locations
  • Careers
  • Civics
  • Insights
  • Contact Us