• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP

Newsflash

Reverse CPRA Liability for Attorney’s Fees

May 20182 minute read

When disclosing personnel records under the California Public Records Act (“CPRA”), public agencies often seek a careful balance between disclosing what is required by law and protecting employee privacy rights.  It is common for public agencies to redact and withhold records they reasonably believe violate employee privacy rights, which may lead to the requestor filing a lawsuit seeking to compel production and reimbursement for attorney’s fees.  One factor that might go into an agency’s decision to redact and withhold records is that employees and unions may file “reverse-CPRA” actions to prevent public agencies from disclosing records.  Until recently, no court had held that employees and unions who pursued this type of action could be liable for a requestor’s attorney fees.

This changed as a result of a recent case, Pasadena Police Officers Association v. City of Pasadena (Cal. Ct. App., Apr. 12, 2018), in which the California Court of Appeal held that employees and unions who file reverse-CPRA actions may be liable for the requestor’s attorney fees.  In that case, the Los Angeles Times (“Times”) made a CPRA request for the City of Pasadena (“City”) to produce a copy of an investigative report regarding a 2012 officer-involved shooting.  The City agreed to release the report with confidential police officer personnel records redacted.  The Pasadena Police Officer Association (“Association”) then filed the reverse-CPRA lawsuit to prevent the City from releasing the entire report, and the Times filed a lawsuit to compel production without any redaction.

The trial court agreed with the City that the report was a public record and that portions regarding confidential personnel information could be redacted.  The Times successfully argued, however, that the City over-redacted the report and, as a result, sought attorney’s fees against the City and Association for $350,422.  The trial court awarded only attorney’s fees for the Times’ efforts to enforce its request against the City—at approximately $45,472—but not for its work to defend against the Association’s reverse-CPRA action, even though the trial court acknowledged that the Times was principally opposed to the Association, and not the City, throughout the litigation.

The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees against the City, but reversed the trial court’s conclusion that the Times could not obtain attorney’s fees against the Association for having to defend against an unsuccessful reverse-CPRA action.  The court reasoned that attorney’s fees were appropriate in a reverse-PRA action such as this, which involved public officials and a public employee union pursuing litigation designed to expand the ability of a public agency and its employees to withhold information from the public.  Therefore, the court concluded that it was the Association—and not the City—that was responsible for the portions of attorney’s fees that the Times incurred due to the Association’s unsuccessful efforts to block release of the report.  

For public agencies, Pasadena Police Officers Association is another reminder to be cautious when redacting and/or withholding records.  Public agencies can still be liable for a requestor’s attorney’s fees for overly-redacting and/or withholding records.  But the biggest impact of this case is likely on public employees and unions which may seek to prevent an agency’s disclosure of public records through a reverse-CPRA action.  Now faced with the prospect of being potentially liable for attorney’s fees, public employees and unions may be less willing to pursue reverse-CPRA actions.  Public agencies should be mindful of this when making decisions to redact and/or withhold records going forward.

If you have questions regarding this decision or the CPRA and how it might affect your school district, please call one of our six offices.

Share this page

Professionals

  • Media item displaying: L. Carlos Villegas

    L. Carlos Villegas

    Partner

    Los Angeles
    323.330.6330323.330.6330
    cvillegas@f3law.com
View All Reverse CPRA Liability for Attorney’s Fees Professionals

Related Services

  • Governance & Leadership
Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP
Get our latest newsflashes
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact Us
  • © 2023 Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Professionals
  • Services
    • Business
    • Communications & Media Relations
    • Education Technology
    • Employment Law
    • Facilities & Construction
    • Governance & Leadership
    • Government Affairs & Public Policy
    • Interscholastic Activities
    • Investigations
    • Labor Relations & Negotiations
    • Litigation
    • Next Level Client Services
    • Real Estate & Property
    • Special Education
    • Student Rights & Discipline
    • Title IX
    • Virtual Learning
  • Our Clients
    • Charter Schools
    • Community Colleges
    • Higher Education
    • Independent & Private Schools
    • Public Agencies
    • Public Education K-12
    • Religious & Parochial Schools
  • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Access
  • Events
    • Special Education Symposium
    • Student Legal Symposium
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership
    • Locations
  • Careers
  • Civics
  • Insights
  • Contact Us