• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP

Newsflash

PERB: Use of GPS Devices Must be Negotiated

January 20193 minute read

As tracking technologies—such as global positioning systems (“GPS”) and video surveillance—have become more readily available and less expensive, public employers are increasingly using them for a variety of reasons, including to protect their property, keep persons safe and monitor employee activities. Data received from those technologies may at times reveal information that the employer seeks to use to evaluate or discipline employees, leading to the question: Is the employer required to negotiate before deciding to use such technologies? In a recently published decision, San Bernardino Community College District (2018) PERB Decision No. 2599, the Public Employment Relations Board (“PERB”) held that a community college district was required to negotiate the decision to use a GPS device on a district vehicle.

The facts of the case involved the district’s decision to install a tracking device on a community services officer’s work vehicle after receiving reports that he was leaving his assigned patrol area. When data from the device confirmed that the employee was leaving his assigned patrol area, the district released him. The district then continued using the device when another officer used the same vehicle, and the district terminated that employee when data also confirmed that he was leaving his assigned patrol area. PERB concluded that the underlying decision to use the device was subject to negotiation under the Educational Employment Relations Act (“EERA”) because the primary purpose of the device was to track employee activity, as opposed to a fundamental management prerogative such as protecting public property or keeping staff and members of the public safe.

Notably, PERB compared this to in a similar case decided under the EERA, Rio Hondo Community College District (2013) PERB Decision No. 2313, in which a community college district installed video surveillance equipment for the primary purpose of protecting property and furthering campus safety. PERB held that, in those circumstances, the employer’s decision to install the video surveillance furthered legitimate managerial interests and therefore was not negotiable, but the decision still had negotiable impacts and effects because the data might be used to evaluate or discipline employees.

Because these decisions were made under the EERA, they apply to K-12 school districts and community college districts. However, PERB’s reasoning in these cases may apply to other California public sector bargaining statutes, thereby impacting other types of public employers who seek to use tracking technologies.

Taken together, public school employers and other public employers subject to similar bargaining statutes can take the following lessons from these cases:

  • These cases do not prohibit employers from using tracking and similar technologies. Rather, they require employers to bargain the decision and/or the impacts of the decision to use these technologies in certain circumstances.
  • When determining whether the use of tracking and similar technologies is negotiable, the employer should ask and answer: What is the primary purpose of the technology?
    • If the primary purpose is to monitor employee activity, the employer must provide the affected union(s) with written notice and an opportunity to bargain prior to making a firm decision to use the technology.
    • If the primary purpose is to protect the employer’s property, further safety interests or carry out another type of core managerial interest—and not simply to monitor employees—the underlying decision to use the technology is not negotiable. However, if that decision has foreseeable impacts and effects on matters within the scope of representation—such as if data from the technology could be used to evaluate and discipline employees—the employer must provide written notice and an opportunity to negotiate those impacts and effects. Importantly, the employer must provide this notice sufficiently in advance of implementing the technology to allow time for meaningful negotiations.

If you have any questions regarding these cases or how your agency can utilize tracking technology in compliance with the law, please contact one of our six offices.

Share this page

Professionals

  • Media item displaying: Jordan I. Bilbeisi

    Jordan I. Bilbeisi

    Partner

    San Diego
    760.304.6002760.304.6002
    jbilbeisi@f3law.com
View All PERB: Use of GPS Devices Must be Negotiated Professionals

Related Services

  • Communications & Media Relations
  • Employment Law
Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP
Get our latest newsflashes
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact Us
  • © 2023 Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Professionals
  • Services
    • Business
    • Communications & Media Relations
    • Education Technology
    • Employment Law
    • Facilities & Construction
    • Governance & Leadership
    • Government Affairs & Public Policy
    • Interscholastic Activities
    • Investigations
    • Labor Relations & Negotiations
    • Litigation
    • Next Level Client Services
    • Real Estate & Property
    • Special Education
    • Student Rights & Discipline
    • Title IX
    • Virtual Learning
  • Our Clients
    • Charter Schools
    • Community Colleges
    • Higher Education
    • Independent & Private Schools
    • Public Agencies
    • Public Education K-12
    • Religious & Parochial Schools
  • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Access
  • Events
    • Special Education Symposium
    • Student Legal Symposium
  • Our Firm
    • Leadership
    • Locations
  • Careers
  • Civics
  • Insights
  • Contact Us